Sports Karate vs. Traditional Fighting – Why They Evolved The Way They Did And Employing Both

Sports Karate vs. traditional fighting – is your Dojo’s curriculum working these synergistically? Why each evolved the way they did and why analysis makes them synergistic.
For those who have just about any issues with regards to where by along with how you can work with Find NDIS Service Providers, you are able to call us with the web page.

o Does your dojo have a check system (flow chart) for decision based training towards either dealing with an untrained attacker versus an elite karate athlete?

o Do you have a 1:1 link to your fighting training, kata form and bunkai in a way which also relates to tournament kumite performance?

o Do you engage in the correct tournament fighting approach, or street fighting approach when training?

The recent evolution in sports karate and research into rejuvenating karate bunkai has required schools to change training curriculums in order to be correct and effective in their fighting. Embracing the old and the new Ways is a difficult but necessary challenge to make ones’ karate a complete and educated empty handed fighting art.
Understanding why modern day karate evolved (and realizing what was lost or gained) is a worthwhile journey. This article will overview some of the pros and cons of Dojo curriculum approaches for empty handed fighting. It will touch on: fighting practicality for a particular approach, diversity of knowledge base and training methods, a realistic check against why modern sport Karate differs compared to the traditional koryu & kata (bunkai) ways (such koryu styles include: various Okinawan arts, koryu-uchinadi, Daito-ryu, Matsushita Kushin Ryu, Araki-ryu).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *